Don’t look for fairness in the selection for Vaibhav Suryavanshi… who knows, the next Sachin might be waiting. 2026?
Don’t look for fairness in the selection for Vaibhav Suryavanshi… who knows, the next Sachin might be waiting. 2026?Whether Vaibhav Suryavanshi gets a chance in Team India or not is not just a debate about one player. The real question is whether the team should be selected based on ‘justice’ or according to future needs.
Indian cricket is currently struggling with a problem that most teams in the world would envy. The concern here isn’t about who will open, but rather how to get out the player who has been scoring runs, and at the center of this debate is a 15-year-old boy – Vaibhav Suryawanshi.
Just as quickly as Vaibhav has grabbed the cricket world’s attention, an ethical debate has also sprung up equally fast. Should someone like Sanju Samson, Abhishek Sharma, or Ishan Kishan be dropped just because an extraordinary talent is knocking on the door?
Batting coach Sitanshu Kotak says that a batsman who is consistently scoring runs shouldn’t be taken out just to give a chance to a new player. It sounds completely fair. After all, hard work should be rewarded.
But selecting the Indian team is not an awards ceremony. Medals are not given out here; the team that will win the next match is chosen here. That’s why the first rule of selection is – it can never be completely fair.
With every selection, some deserving player feels ‘unfairly treated.’ If selection were purely about fairness, maybe a new player would never get a chance. Then Virat Kohli would also be waiting for a senior, Jasprit Bumrah would still be sent to take wickets in domestic cricket, and maybe 16-year-old Sachin Tendulkar would be playing the next Ranji match in Mumbai instead of going to Karachi.
In the national team, past innings are respected, but there’s no guarantee for the next spot. Here, every new talent stands in front of a senior player’s seat. To be honest, another name for selection is ruthlessness.
It doesn’t mean that a player who is left out is bad. Even a World Cup-winning captain like Suryakumar Yadav can be left out of the next team. It doesn’t reduce their ability, it just shows that the selectors saw more potential in another player for the team at that time.
The biggest way to secure a spot in international cricket is by scoring runs. But sometimes the opposing player doesn’t just bring runs, they bring the future.
The talk about Vaibhav Suryavanshi is different because he’s not just scoring runs, he’s changing mindsets. Indian cricket produces many talented players every year, but you can’t say about every talent that they can face the fastest bowlers in the world at the age of 15.
Jofra Archer gets affected by the nets. Bowlers like Pat Cummins and Mitchell Starc don’t take him lightly. You don’t see such signs every day. Talents like these aren’t born by looking at a calendar in cricket history.
It doesn’t mean that Vaibhav has to be played in the next match at all costs. The team management is watching him every day. Only they can best assess his preparation, mindset, and technique. But one thing should be clear – the test for decisions can’t be ‘who will be wronged?’
Yes, the other side of this debate is just as strong…
If a batsman is playing fearlessly for the team, taking risks, and scoring runs consistently, yet his spot isn’t secure, it sends a dangerous message in the dressing room. Players start playing less for the team and more to save their own place. If a player feels that even after scoring runs his spot isn’t guaranteed, next time he’ll play not for the team, but to protect his own place. The biggest strength of the fearless batting culture India has developed in T20 cricket over the past few years is that players play free from the fear of failure. It’s the team management’s responsibility to ensure that trust is not broken.
This is where the real test for the captain and coach comes. They not only have to pick the right team, but also keep the trust of the players sitting out.
Still, one question remains…
If the Indian team truly believes that Vaibhav Suryavanshi could be part of the 2027 ODI World Cup plans, then the preparation will start not in 2027, but in 2026. International cricket isn’t learned by reading books. You have to go out on the field, make mistakes, and learn from them.
This is why in Vaibhav’s case, the biggest mistake might not be rushing, but being overly cautious. The biggest mistake in history isn’t picking the wrong player; it’s recognizing the right player too late. For Indian cricket today, the real question isn’t when Vaibhav Suryavanshi will make his debut.
Don’t look for fairness in the selection for Vaibhav Suryavanshi… who knows, the next Sachin might be waiting. 2026? Don’t look for fairness in the selection for Vaibhav Suryavanshi… who knows, the next Sachin might be waiting. 2026 Don’t look for fairness in the selection for Vaibhav Suryavanshi… who knows, the next Sachin might be waiting. 2026? Don’t look for fairness in the selection for Vaibhav Suryavanshi… who knows, the next Sachin might be waiting. 2026?
;;; THE END ;;;
